 |
Ben Earwicker Garrison Photography, Boise, ID www.garrisonphoto.org |
This post is an emotional response to a disagreement I had with my cousin recently over something I posted on Facebook. To my knowledge she doesn't know about or read my blog, but if she does perhaps this will better explain my position.
Yesterday morning a shared an image that
Kim posted of a little girl in front of a painting of a dancer and posing in a similar manner. I thought it was so cute and worth a share. Because I generally don't post things about cute kids and babies on my Facebook, I prefaced the picture by saying: "I'm not a huge fan of kids...especially in galleries, this this is so cute!" I got a few "likes" in the morning, but by evening my cousin, mother of two, saw it and was offended.
I tried my best to explain that I didn't hate her kids and that it was silly to even think that - but it wasn't that that irked her. What bothered her was my suggestion that children do not belong in art galleries.
I'm all for introducing kids to a bit of culture - art, music, literature - but there are right and wrong ways to do this. There are plenty of kid friendly environments for this. In my experience children under a certain age get bored easily. They're thirsty, hungry, tired, have to go to the bathroom, and just want to go home. Most art galleries are in big rooms with high, echoey ceilings - not great for when a baby is crying or when a young one is having a temper tantrum. For me the experience of exploring an art gallery is a very private and quiet activity. There were moments when I was in the National Art Gallery of Canada where I was moved by the sheer fact that I was starring at famous pieces of art. Monet, Picasso, Pollack, The Group of Seven - all pieces I'd only ever seen in books. I know this probably all sounds terribly snobbish, but I really feel like if you're going to pay $10 or more to go into a gallery you should truly appreciate what you're looking at.
I can't tell parents not to bring their kids to art galleries, kids even have a cheaper entry fee at most I've seen, but I won't pretend like I don't cringe when I see a family come lumbering into a room, kids running all over the place, touching things. When I say art gallery, I mean just that - don't confuse them with museums with dinosaur bones and ancient Egyptian costumes, those are totally family friendly. I mean art galleries with walls of paintings, and sculptures behind glass. Fine art.
We have, in our society, created many safe, sterile, kid friendly spaces. Parks, arts and crafts programs, community centres, mommy groups and the like. The world is practically their playground. But I'd argue that adults need sanctuaries as well. Spaces that are adult only, but not a bar or strip club. Places that are quiet and peaceful away from the world of runny noses and poopy diapers.
Of course there are exceptions to every "rule" - I'm sure there are a few kids out there who also find peace and tranquility in a gallery setting. Like the little girl in the photo, one may find ways to interact with the works of art on a non-intrusive level. And to the parents of those wonderful little ones I applaud you for having a freaking amazing child. But I'd say it's probably pretty rare to find a kid who'd choose an art gallery over playing video games with his or her friends on a Sunday afternoon.
You are free to agree or disagree with me, but this isn't an argument - it's an opinion. One that anyone can freely reject. I'm not wrong or right, it's just what I think. It's how I feel about it.